Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Assessing the Attitudes and Perceptions of Community Members and Health Workers Regarding Leprosy Stigma

Silatham Sermrittirong, Wim H. Van Brakel, Siramas Rodchan, Suwit Nuncho, J. F. G. Bunders-Aelen

International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health · pp. 11–24 · Published 24 Oct 2014

10.9734/IJTDH/2015/11897

Abstract

Aims: To examine the attitudes and the perceptions of community members and health workers towards leprosy, to study possible determinants of stigma and to provide baseline data for those who are interested in launching de-stigmatising interventions. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey using mixed methods Place and Duration of Study: Raj Pracha Samasai Institute and Chaiyaphum province, Thailand, March- August 2011. Methodology: The study was done using qualitative and quantitative methods in four districts. Interview guidelines, a predefined script and the Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue (EMIC) stigma scale were used as data collection tools. For qualitative data collection, community members were selected by maximum variation sampling based on sex, age and socio-economic status; health workers were selected by including those who were present at the sub-district health promotion hospital at the time of interviewing, and those who were responsible for leprosy and tuberculosis at the district hospital. Focus Group Discussions were conducted among health volunteers who were also community members and had people affected by leprosy in the areas in which they worked. For quantitative data collection, community members were selected by systematic sampling. Health workers were selected by convenience sampling. Content analysis was used for qualitative information. A t-test, a Chi square and multiple regressions were used for quantitative data. A p-value of <0.05 was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference or association. Results: An equal number of community members and health workers was enrolled (n=236). There was significant difference at the 5% level (p=0.007, Chi2 test) between the proportion of community members and of health workers who perceived stigma related to leprosy in the community (75.4% and 85.6%, respectively). A statistically significant association was found between age, education, number of family members and type of house, and those who perceived stigma. All 24 community members, four health volunteers and two health workers in the qualitative sample linked leprosy with disability, while none of the community members or health volunteers knew the cause of leprosy. All thought it to be incurable. Fifteen community members thought leprosy is hereditary. Seventeen community members and two health workers linked leprosy with dirtiness. One out of the two health workers linked leprosy with oozy and bad-smelling wounds. It was also found that people affected avoided social contact, attended health services as little as possible, and experienced negative interaction from others in the community, health workers included. Conclusion: In the perception of community members and health workers leprosy is a disabling disease that is incurable and hereditary, and is associated with dirtiness and oozy and bad-smelling wounds. These negative perceptions may result in reduced quality of life for those affected and hamper their access to health care services. The authors propose that de-stigmatising interventions be prioritised, taking local beliefs, attitudes, and perceptions into consideration.

Measurement stigma attitude perception leprosy health workers community members discrimination

References (22)

  1. 1 Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires [DOI]
  2. 2 Adequacy of Sample Size in Health Studies [DOI]
  3. 3 Health-related stigma: Rethinking concepts and interventions 1 [DOI]
  4. 4 The fight against stigma: An overview of stigma-reduction strategies and interventions [DOI]
  5. 5 Measuring health-related stigma—A literature review [DOI]
  6. 6 Disability in people affected by leprosy: the role of impairment, activity, social participation, stigma and discrimination [DOI]
  7. 7 Stigma, depression, and somatization in South India [DOI]
  8. 8 The Explanatory Model Interview Catalogue (EMIC) [DOI]
  9. 9 Stigma in leprosy: concepts, causes and determinants [DOI]
  10. 10 Curing the stigma of leprosy [DOI]
  11. 11 The Dynamics of Stigma in Leprosy [DOI]
  12. 12 STEP: An intervention to address the issue of stigma related to leprosy in Southern Nepal [DOI]
  13. 13 Depressive status of leprosy patients in Bangladesh: association with self-perception of stigma [DOI]
  14. 14 Measuring leprosy-related stigma – a pilot study to validate a toolkit of instruments [DOI]
  15. 15 Leprosy: between acceptance and segregation. Community behaviour towards persons affected by leprosy in eastern Nepal [DOI]
  16. 16 Social stigma: a comparative qualitative study of integrated and vertical care approaches to leprosy [DOI]
  17. 17 Impact of leprosy on the quality of life.
  18. 18 Delay in Presentation in the Context of Local Knowledge and Attitude Towards Leprosy—The Results of Qualitative Fieldwork in Paraguay [DOI]
  19. 19 Gender and tuberculosis: cross-site analysis and implications of a multi-country study in Bangladesh India Malawi and Colombia.
  20. 20 Can social marketing approaches change community attitudes towards leprosy? [DOI]
  21. 21 Lessons from the evolution of a CBR programme for people affected by leprosy in Northern Nigeria [DOI]
  22. 22 Khi Thut : the disease of social loathing : an anthropology of the stigma of leprosy in rural northeast Thailand

Cited by 13

<p>Knowledge of and Attitude Toward Leprosy in a Leprosy Endemic District, Eastern Ethiopia: A Community-Based Study</p>

Kedir Urgesa, Kidist Bobosha, Berhanu Seyoum · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · 2020

A single dose of rifampicin to prevent leprosy; quantitative analysis of impact on perception, attitudes and behaviour of persons affected, contacts and community members towards leprosy in India, Nepal and Indonesia

L. Mieras, M. K. Singh, P. R. Manglani · Leprosy Review · 2020

Leprosy stigma in the healthcare setting: Lived experiences of persons affected by leprosy in Niger

Amina Paula Alio, Ibrahim Malam Mamane Sani, Yohanna Abdou · PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases · 2025

An Exploratory Cross-sectional Study on Public Stigma against Coronavirus Disease 2019 from Punjab

Neha Gill, Jasmin Garg, Rohit Garg · Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry · 2023

Showing 4 of 13 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

23

Page views

0

PDF downloads

10

Outbound clicks

13

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.