Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Effect of Different Surface Pre-Treatments on the Repair Bond Strength of Resin Composite Subjected to Artificially Accelerated Aging: An in vitro Study

Gupta Geetanjali, Mukherjee Abhik, Taneja Sonali

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 100–108 · Published 1 Dec 2025

10.9734/jammr/2025/v37i126001

Abstract

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate and compare the surface roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of aged composite repairs using three surface pretreatment methods—diamond bur (DP), tungsten carbide bur (TC), and air abrasion (AA)—in combination with two universal adhesives: Prime & Bond Universal (PBU) and Single Bond Universal (SBU). Methodology: Seventy-two composite discs were fabricated and aged by thermocycling. Specimens were randomly divided into three groups (n=24) based on surface pretreatment: Group A (DP), Group B (TC), and Group C. Surface roughness (Ra) was assessed using a profilometer on half the specimens from each group. All specimens were then acid-etched and further subdivided based on the adhesive used (SBU or PBU, n=12 each). Neo Spectra ST was bonded over the treated surface using a cylindrical mold and light-cured. SBS testing was conducted using a UTM, and failure modes were analyzed under stereomicroscope. Results: Surface roughness values varied across treatment groups, with air abrasion showing the highest Ra, followed by TC and DP. SBS results indicated that surface pre-treatment significantly influenced bonding efficacy. SBU demonstrated slightly higher SBS compared to PBU across most surface treatments. The highest SBS was observed in the group treated with DP combined with SBU (C2), suggesting a synergistic effect between mechanical and chemical bonding. Mixed failure modes were most common. Conclusion: Diamond point, followed by air abrasion application of Single Bond Universal yielded the most favorable outcomes, indicating superior micro-mechanical interlocking and chemical adhesion.

Aged composite repair universal adhesives surface pretreatment

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

4

Page views

0

PDF downloads

5

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.