Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Estimation of Parameters and Optimality of Second-Order Spherical Designs Using Quadratic Function Relative to Non-Spherical Face centered CCD

Onu, Obineke Henry, Ijomah, Maxwell Azubuike, Osahogulu, Dele Joshua

Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics · pp. 23–37 · Published 19 Jul 2022

10.9734/ajpas/2022/v18i330449

Abstract

The study presented the estimation of parameters and optimality of second-order spherical designs using quadratic model in comparison to the non-spherical face centered CCD for varying axial distances. The designs considered were equiradial design of axial distances of 1.0 and 1.414, inscribed CCD of axial distance of 1.0 and circumscribed CCD of axial distance of 1.414, the study employed sum of square error, variance estimation, D-, A-, and T-optimality criteria as well as Grand mean of these designs for quadratic model and 1 to 10 center runs were considered. The study observed that the sum of square error of the non-spherical face centred CCD is zero (0) for radial point of n=5 with 1 centre point and this result is seen to be a misleading result, because, no process is 100%. While the sum of square error of the spherical designs with axial distance of 1.0 gave minimal sum of square errors and the spherical designs with axial distance of 1.414 gave very large sum of square error. The Grand mean of the spherical and the non-spherical designs were equal or approximately equal for radial point of n=5 for centre points 1-10 inclusive. But as the radial distance increases above 5, the Grand mean of the non-spherical CCD differs significantly from those of the spherical designs. The study suggests that the non-spherical second order design is inferior to their spherical second order design counterparts. The spherical designs with axial distance of 1.414 (equiradial and circumscribed CCD) have better D-optimality, A-optimality and T-optimality than the non-spherical face centred CCD, while, the spherical designs with axial distance of 1.0 (equiradial and inscribed) has inferior D-optimality, A-optimality and T-optimality compared to the non-spherical face centred CCD with axial distance of 1.0.

Spherical design Non-spherical design Second order design equiradial design face centred design central composite designs quadratic model

References (12)

  1. 1 Estimating the Dimension of a Model [DOI]
  2. 2 On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions [DOI]
  3. 3 On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions [DOI]
  4. 4 Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments [DOI]
  5. 5 Applied Linear Regression Models. [DOI]
  6. 6 Central Composite Design for Response Surface Methodology and Its Application in Pharmacy [DOI]
  7. 7 Selecting the Right Central Composite Design
  8. 8 Graphical Evaluation of the Prediction Capabilities of Partially Replicated Orthogonal Central Composite Designs [DOI]
  9. 9 Optimal Partially Replicated Cube, Star and Center Runs in Face-centered Central Composite Designs [DOI]
  10. 10 Use of Doehlert Designs for Second-order Polynomial Models [DOI]
  11. 11 On comparing the prediction variances of some central composite designs in spherical regions: a review [DOI]
  12. 12 International Journal of Applied Science and Mathematical Theory [DOI]

Cited by 4

Response Surface Optimization of Alkylphenolate Additive AKI-152 for High-Performance Motor Oils in Oil and Gas Applications

R. Gasimov, E. Naghiyeva, A. Sujayev · SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants · 2026

Replication of Axial Points in Two-Factor Doehlert and Central Composite Designs with a Single Centre Point

Obineke Henry Onu, N. Akani · Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Scientific Innovations · 2025

Showing 2 of 4 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

21

Page views

0

PDF downloads

1

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.