Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Evaluation of Sustainable Management Options for the Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Maize Production in Burkina Faso

Innocent S. Yaméogo, Awa Ouedraogo, Delphine Ouattara, Rémy A. Dabiré, Olivier GNANKINE, Souleymane Nacro

Journal of Applied Life Sciences International · pp. 119–135 · Published 20 Dec 2024

10.9734/jalsi/2024/v27i6672

Abstract

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, attacks important cereals, such as corn, millet and sorghum, causing economic damage. It is has been a new biotic constraint to African agriculture since it invaded the African continent in 2016. Reported in Burkina Faso in 2017, it is present in all regions of the country, causing significant damage to cereal crops. Faced with this threat, farmers have opposed several control methods, including mainly synthetic chemical pesticides with all the consequences that this entails. With this in mind, an evaluation of several sustainable management options for this insect pest was initiated in Bama in western Burkina Faso during the consecutive dry and wet seasons of 2023. For this purpose, a completely randomized block design was set up. It consisted of four treatments, T0 = absolute control; T1=combination Push-pull technology-Jatropha curcas oil; T2 = combination Push-pull technology-Azadirachta indica oil; T3=combination Push-pull technology-Emamectin benzoate. Four replicates were used. Data were collected by random sampling on twenty maize plants in each elementary plot. Results showed that the different S. frugiperda management options reduced significantly pest damage rates: T3 (28% dry season, 34.50% wet season), T1 (41.88% dry season, 47.64% wet season) and T2 (37.88% dry season, 45.38% wet season) compared with the control (66.38% dry season, 59.75% wet season). The best yields were also recorded with management options T1 (3.52t/ha), T2 (3.73t/ha), and T3 (3.57t/ha) for the dry season and T1 (2.91t/ha), T2 (3.26t/ha) and T3 (3.34t/ha) for the wet season and were not significantly different. The Push-Pull-Emamectin option is recommended to Burkina Faso farmers for the control of the Fall Armyworm.

Burkina Faso maize pesticides Spodoptera frugiperda push-pull

References (12)

  1. 1 Fall Armyworm: Impacts and Implications for Africa [DOI]
  2. 2 Intercropping increases parasitism of pests [DOI]
  3. 3 Chemical composition and insecticidal properties of the underutilized Jatropha curcas seed oil [DOI]
  4. 4 Visual rating scales for screening whorl-stage corn for resistance to fall armyworm
  5. 5 Spread of invasive migratory pest Spodoptera frugiperda and management practices throughout China [DOI]
  6. 6 Comparison of larval performance and oviposition preference of Spodoptera frugiperda among three host plants: Potential risks to potato and tobacco crops [DOI]
  7. 7 Larval diet affects development and reproduction of East Asian strain of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda [DOI]
  8. 8 Oviposition preference not necessarily predicts offspring performance in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on vegetable crops [DOI]
  9. 9 Ovipositional responses of Spodoptera frugiperda on host plants provide a basis for using Bt-transgenic maize as trap crop in China [DOI]
  10. 10 Impact of push-pull technology on the nutritional status of farmers’ children in western Kenya [DOI]
  11. 11 Annals of the Entomological Society of America [DOI]
  12. 12 International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences

Cited by 1

Effect of Natural and Artificial Diets on the Biological Performance of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Muhammad Ahmad Alizai, Muhammad Shavaiz Baloch, Rahat Ullah Khan · Planta Animalia · 2026

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

51

Page views

0

PDF downloads

12

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.