Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Nutritional Qualities of Ginger Mutant Lines Grown in the Humid Tropical Agroecology of Nigeria

M. N. Abua, M. A. Ittah, E. E. Obok, G. A. Iwo, R. E. Edugbo, C. O. Amadi

Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research · pp. 35–42 · Published 19 Feb 2020

10.9734/ajaar/2020/v12i230080

Abstract

The present study was aimed to determine the variations in nutritional qualities of 15 mutant lines and two landraces of ginger (Zingiber officinale). Fifteen (15) gamma (γ)-ray induced mutants lines and two landraces of ginger were planted in 2017 early cropping season in the Teaching and Research Farm, Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Wildlife Resources Management, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria. To evaluate the nutritional qualities of these seventeen ginger genotypes at maturity, proximate analysis was carried out in the Biochemistry Laboratory of the National Root Crop Research Institute Umudike, Abia State, Nigeria. Using standard and official protocols of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Results showed that the ginger lines varied significantly (P < 0.01) in all their proximate attributes. The moisture content ranged from 10.13% (UG1) to 12.95% (UG2). Mean dry matter was 88.89%; UG1 and UG2 had the highest (89.89%) and lowest (87.05%) dry matter content, respectively. Mean crude protein was 7.74%; UG2-9-01 and UG2-11-03 had the highest (8.25%) and lowest (7.29%) crude protein respectively. UG1-5-38 and UG1-5-22 had the highest (8.12%) and lowest (6.41%) crude fibre content respectively. The oleoresin content ranged from (6.25%) in UG2-9-01 to (9.09%) in UG1-11-07. UG1-5-04 and UG1-5-22 had the highest (2.88%) and lowest (2.22%) ash content respectively. UG2-9-01 had the highest carbohydrate content of (65.10%). While UG1-5-52 had the lowest (61.27%) The result showed that the ginger lines used in this study had high mean carbohydrate (62.85%) and protein (7.74%) contents as such can be used as supplementary sources of these nutrients for human and livestock. UG1-7-24, UG1-11-07 and UG1-5-18 with high oleoresin contents of 9.11%, 9.09% and 9.05% respectively are recommended to ginger breeders as useful genotypes for improving other ginger lines through micropropagation techniques especially when breeding for oleoresin quality, which is an important quality of ginger. In conclusion, further evaluation and testing of these ginger lines is recommended.

Ginger oleoresin induced mutant micropropagation landraces.

References (9)

  1. 1 Some phytochemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): A review of recent research [DOI]
  2. 2 Effects of a ginger extract on knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis [DOI]
  3. 3 Bioactive Molecules and Medicinal Plants [DOI]
  4. 4 Chemical Profile of Unripe Pulp of Carica papaya [DOI]
  5. 5 Proximate and nutrient composition of medicinal plants of humid and sub-humid regions in North-west Pakistan. [DOI]
  6. 6 Comparative Proximate Analysis of Some Food Condiments
  7. 7 Elemental profile in some common medicinal plants of India. Its correlation with traditional therapeutic usage [DOI]
  8. 8 Densitometric HPTLC analysis of 8–gingerol in Zingiber officinale extract and ginger–containing dietary supplements, teas and commercial creams [DOI]
  9. 9 Extraction And Chemical Compositions of Ginger (Zingiber Officinale Roscoe) Essential Oils As Cockroaches Repellent

Cited by 3

Showing 2 of 3 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

25

Page views

0

PDF downloads

9

Outbound clicks

3

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.