Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Performance Measurement System Design for Integrated Thinking: Evidence from Japanese Electric Utility Providers

Kevin Massmann

Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting · pp. 250–261 · Published 6 Aug 2024

10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i81454

Abstract

Asian companies are increasingly practicing integrated reporting to create long-term economic, environmental, and social value for investors and other stakeholders. To accomplish such value creation, far-reaching changes in strategies, management control systems, and governance are required, which is achieved through a management approach called integrated thinking. However, findings from previous studies indicate barriers in designing performance measurement systems, leading to misalignment between strategies and managers' decision-making. Therefore, this research study aims to expand existing knowledge on integrated reporting by (1) developing a conceptual framework for the characteristics of performance measurement systems to support integrated thinking and (2) analyzing the current status of performance measurement systems used by Japanese electric utility providers. To support integrated thinking, performance measurement systems should contain multidimensional and connected key performance indicators with quantitative target values and action plans that are integrated into the management reward system. By utilizing primary data, the most recent integrated reports of all 11 Japanese electric utility providers were analyzed trough a manual content analysis and percentage analysis. On average, the requirements of performance measurement system design are fulfilled to a degree of 56 %, while the lowest degree being 39 % and the highest degree being 75 %. In most cases, companies use multidimensional key performance indicators with incomplete target values and vaguely defined action plans. Key performance indicators are insufficiently connected and integrated with rewards systems, indicating the outside-in approach of integrated reporting. Larger companies that explicitly refer to the <IR> Framework tend to use more sophisticated performance measurement systems. The findings suggest several areas for improvement, such as connectivity between KPIs as well as further integrating non-financial KPIs with the rewards system.

Corporate sustainability integrated reporting integrated thinking management control performance measurement

References (34)

  1. 1 Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. [DOI]
  2. 2 Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems [DOI]
  3. 3 Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research [DOI]
  4. 4 One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy
  5. 5 The Execution Premium: Linking Strategy to Operations for Competitive Advantage [DOI]
  6. 6 Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research [DOI]
  7. 7 Integrated Reporting and internal mechanisms of change [DOI]
  8. 8 The dynamics of value creation: mapping your intellectual performance drivers [DOI]
  9. 9 Integrated Reporting, Quality of Management, and Financial Performance [DOI]
  10. 10 Walking the talk(s): Organisational narratives of integrated reporting [DOI]
  11. 11 Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use [DOI]
  12. 12 Integrated reporting and integrated thinking in Italian public sector organisations [DOI]
  13. 13 The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Strategy Formulation Processes [DOI]
  14. 14 A conceptual and operational delineation of performance [DOI]
  15. 15 Exploring the challenges of preparing an integrated report [DOI]
  16. 16 The Sustainable Development Goals, integrated thinking and the integrated report [DOI]
  17. 17 Refining integrated thinking [DOI]
  18. 18 Integrated thinking leading to integrated reporting: case study insights from a global player [DOI]
  19. 19 A decade of integrated reporting studies: state of the art and future research implications [DOI]
  20. 20 Hallmarks of Integrated Thinking [DOI]
  21. 21 An examination of the literature relating to issues affecting how companies manage through measures [DOI]
  22. 22 Executing strategy through comprehensive performance measurement systems [DOI]
  23. 23 Integrated Reporting and Integrating Thinking: Practical Challenges [DOI]
  24. 24 How management control systems enable and constrain integrated thinking [DOI]
  25. 25 Insights from narrative disclosures regarding integrated thinking in integrated reports in South Africa and Japan [DOI]
  26. 26 Integrated thinking in the integrated reports of public sector companies. Evidence and contextual factors [DOI]
  27. 27 Adoption of integrated reporting and changes to internal mechanisms in Japanese companies [DOI]
  28. 28 Integrate: Doing Business in the 21st Century
  29. 29 Managing Performance in Turbulent Times: Analytics and Insight
  30. 30 'Integrated Reporting Is Like God: No One Has Met Him, but Everybody Talks About Him.' The Power of Myths in the Adoption of Management Innovations
  31. 31 Integrated thinking or integrated reporting, which comes first? [DOI]
  32. 32 Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions [DOI]
  33. 33 Management Control Systems [DOI]
  34. 34 Integrated thinking as a cultural control? [DOI]

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

27

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.