Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

A Mathematical Model for Plato's Theory of Forms

George Chailos

Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science · pp. 3105–3119 · Published 27 Aug 2014

10.9734/BJMCS/2014/12591

Abstract

Aims/ Objectives: In this article we construct a mathematical/topological framework for comprehending fundamental concepts in Plato's theory of Forms; specically the dual processes of: 1. The participation/partaking-methexis of the many particulars predicated as F to the Form-essence F, according to their degree of participation to it. 2. The presence-parousia of the Form-essence F to the particulars predicated as F, in analogy to their degree of participation to F as in 1. The theoretical foundation of our model is primarily based on a combination of both the Approximationist and Predicationalist approaches for Plato's theory of Forms, taking into account the degree of participation of the particulars to the Form, that are predicated to. In constructing our model we assume that there exists exactly one Form corresponding to every predicate that has a Form (Plato's `uniqueness thesis'), and to support our main theses we analyze textual evidence from various Platonic works. The mathematical model is founded on the dual notions of projective and inductive topologies, and their projective and inductive limits respectively.

Platonic Philosophy Projective and Inductive Topologies and Limits.

References (23)

  1. 1 Topological Vector Spaces. [DOI]
  2. 2 An Introduction to Plato's Republic. [DOI]
  3. 3 The Philosophy of Mathematics [DOI]
  4. 4 Plato on the Imperfection of the Sensible World
  5. 5 Plato's Earlier Dialectic. [DOI]
  6. 6 Plato, the man and his work
  7. 7 The Logic of the Third Man [DOI]
  8. 8 The Dialectic of Essence [DOI]
  9. 9 Essence and Accident [DOI]
  10. 10 Plato's Republic: The Line and the Cave [DOI]
  11. 11 Continuity and Incommensurability in Ancient Greek Philosophy and Mathematics [DOI]
  12. 12 Self-Predication and Plato's Theory of Forms
  13. 13 Plato's "Third Man" Argument (PARM. 132A1-B2): Text and Logic [DOI]
  14. 14 Proclus' Commentary on Plato's Parmenides [DOI]
  15. 15 Plato on the Self-Predication of Forms [DOI]
  16. 16 Plato's philosophical method in the Republic: the Divided Line (510b–511d) [DOI]
  17. 17 The Anthyphairetic Revolutions of the Platonic Ideas [DOI]
  18. 18 A Necessary Falsehood in the Third Man Argument [DOI]
  19. 19 The Hypotheses of Mathematics in Plato’s Republic and his Contribution to the Axiomatization of Geometry [DOI]
  20. 20 Proclus' commentary on the first book of Euclid's elements
  21. 21 The topology of the class of functions representable by Carleman type formulae, duality and applications [DOI]
  22. 22 Plato's theory of knowledge of Forms by Division and Collection in the Sophistes is a philosophic analogue of periodic anthyphairesis (and modern continued fractions) [DOI]
  23. 23 On Theodorus' lesson in the Theaetetus 147d-e [DOI]

Cited by 3

3 citations reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

6

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

3

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.