Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

An Economic analysis of Value Chain and Marketing Efficiency of Tomato in Davanagere District of Karnataka, India

S. Raveesha, T. B. Chethana, MM. Venkatesha

Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 218–224 · Published 20 Aug 2026

10.9734/jeai/2026/v48i94453

Abstract

This study examined value addition and marketing efficiency in the tomato value chain in Davanagere district, Karnataka, using primary data from 60 farmers and 15 market intermediaries. A multistage sampling procedure was used, and three marketing channels were identified: Channel I (Producer → Commission Agent → Wholesaler → Retailer → Consumer), Channel II (Producer → Retailer → Consumer), and Channel III (Producer → Reliance Retail Limited → Collection Centre → Supermarket → Consumer). Marketing costs, gross value addition, price spread, producer’s share in the consumer’s rupee, and Acharya’s marketing efficiency index were estimated for comparison. Channel III provided the highest net price to farmers (₹2702.50/qtl), total gross value addition (₹3495.00/qtl), producer’s share in the consumer’s rupee (65.91%), and marketing efficiency (1.93). Channel II recorded the lowest price spread (₹1117.50/qtl) and a marketing efficiency of 1.23, while Channel I recorded the lowest marketing efficiency (0.52) and producer’s share (33.90%). The results indicate that channels with fewer intermediaries or organised retail linkages were associated with higher producer returns and improved marketing efficiency. However, the continued use of the traditional channel reflects farmers’ dependence on commission agents for credit, advance payments, market support, and the sale of ungraded produce. Strengthening direct market linkages, organised procurement, grading, storage, cold-chain facilities, transportation, and institutional credit may improve value-chain performance and farmers’ market outcomes.

Tomato value chain value addition marketing efficiency marketing channels price spread producer’s share organised retail farm-gate price market intermediaries

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

43

Page views

0

PDF downloads

13

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.