Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparison of Two Survey Methods Based on Response Distribution of Pediatricians Regarding Immunization for Children in India: Mail versus Telephone

Roy L. Zhang, Naveen Thacker, Panna Choudhury, Karen Pazol, Walter A. Orenstein, Saad B. Omer, James M. Hughes, Paul S. Weiss, Lisa M. Gargano

International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health · pp. 1–10 · Published 22 Apr 2016

10.9734/IJTDH/2016/24051

Abstract

Introduction: The use of telephone and mail surveys raises the question to what extent the results of different data collection methods deviate from one another. Aim: To determine if there is any difference in the response distribution between telephone and mail surveys of vaccination related-attitudes. Methods: A random sample of 400 pediatricians who are members of the India Academy of Pediatrics and work at various locations in India was selected. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test was applied; significance level was alpha=0.05. Difference in percentage points of the majority response was calculated in the following way ∆=telephone% - mail%. Results: Only 36% responded to mail surveys and 57% responded to telephone surveys. Pediatricians in both telephone and mail surveys agreed for the majority of survey questions but to a different degree on particular items. More pediatricians in the telephone arm responded that measles eradication is important with a p=0.001 and ∆=8.3. More mail than telephone respondents reported that it is parents’ responsibility to ensure child is vaccinated (∆= -7.9, P=0.002) and that they would refer parents to a facility of their choice to get vaccines (∆=14, P=0.008). Conclusion: The results show evidence of the interviewer and/or social desirability bias and its influence on response choices. This suggests that mode of administration should be standardized or carefully adjusted for during analysis. Alternatively, further question development may minimize the sensitivity of items to mode of data collection.

Survey mode attitudes vaccines India pediatricians

References (36)

  1. 1 Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
  2. 2 The Psychology of Survey Response [DOI]
  3. 3 The health belief model.
  4. 4 Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology
  5. 5 Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Question Format, and Question Context [DOI]
  6. 6 Research Methods in Health [DOI]
  7. 7 An Evaluation of a Cognitive Theory of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement [DOI]
  8. 8 How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8™ Health Survey.
  9. 9 Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients [DOI]
  10. 10 Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Process to Survey Methodology [DOI]
  11. 11 Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys. [DOI]
  12. 12 Asking Questions
  13. 13 Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National Survey [DOI]
  14. 14 Interpreting SF&-36 summary health measures: A response [DOI]
  15. 15 Telephone Survey Methodology. [DOI]
  16. 16 Rating Scales: Numeric Values May Change the Meaning of Scale Labels [DOI]
  17. 17 Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys.
  18. 18 Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches [DOI]
  19. 19 Functional Outcome at 2.5, 5, 9, and 24 Months After Injury in the Netherlands [DOI]
  20. 20 National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response [DOI]
  21. 21 An Examination of Self- and Telephone-Administered Modes of Administration for the Australian SF-36 [DOI]
  22. 22 The effect of mode of data collection and of non‐response on reported alcohol consumption: a split‐sample study in Switzerland [DOI]
  23. 23 Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys [DOI]
  24. 24 The Interview Mode Effect on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale [DOI]
  25. 25 Patient Satisfaction Measurement Strategies: A Comparison of Phone and Mail Methods [DOI]
  26. 26 Influence of patients’ age and sex and the mode of administration on results from the NHS Friends and Family Test of patient experience [DOI]
  27. 27 Does the mode of administration of the Oral Health Impact Profile-49 affect the outcome score? [DOI]
  28. 28 Comparing Telephone and Mail Responses to the CAHPS™ Survey Instrument [DOI]
  29. 29 Mode Effects in a Survey of Medicare Prostate Surgery Patients [DOI]
  30. 30 Comparison of Telephone and Postal Survey Modes on Respiratory Symptoms and Risk Factors [DOI]
  31. 31 Comparison of Modes of Administration and Alternative Formats for Eliciting Societal Preferences for Burden of Illness [DOI]
  32. 32 Patient satisfaction or acquiescence? Comparing mail and telephone survey results.
  33. 33 A Comparison of Mail and Telephone Interview Strategies for Mental Health Surveys [DOI]
  34. 34 Effect of the Method of Administration, Mail or Telephone, on the Validity and Reliability of a Respiratory Health Questionnaire. The Spanish Centers of the European Asthma Study [DOI]
  35. 35 Mode Effects in Survey Research: a Comparison of Mail, Telephone, and Face To Face Surveys [DOI]
  36. 36 Methods to influence response to postal questionnaires [DOI]

Cited by 4

Authors’ response

Pranab Chatterjee, Tanu Anand, Kh. Jitenkumar Singh · Indian Journal of Medical Research · 2020

Authors’ response

Pranab Chatterjee, Tanu Anand, Kh. Jitenkumar Singh · Indian Journal of Medical Research · 2020

Authors’ response

Pranab Chatterjee, Tanu Anand, Kh. Jitenkumar Singh · Indian Journal of Medical Research · 2020

Showing 3 of 4 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.