Curriculum Evaluation of the BS in Public Administration Program: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective

Abstract

Aims: The study aimed to conduct a comprehensive curriculum evaluation of the Bachelor of Science in Public Administration (BSPA) program at a local state university to assess its effectiveness, identify its strengths, and gather recommendations for improvement from multiple stakeholders. Study Design: A mixed-method approach was employed, utilizing both quantitative data from a Likert scale survey to measure perceived effectiveness and qualitative feedback gathered through thematic analysis. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at a state university in Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines, collecting data from BSPA students enrolled in the first semester of SY 2024–2025, faculty, and alumni. Methodology: Data were collected from 193 respondents (students, faculty, alumni) using a survey questionnaire administered via Google Forms. Convenience sampling was utilized for each group. Descriptive statistics, specifically the weighted mean, were used to analyze the perceived level of effectiveness of the curriculum. Thematic analysis was applied to identify perceived strengths and gather respondents' suggestions for its improvement. Results: The BSPA curriculum is perceived as effective in developing knowledge and theories based on the field (3.27) and aligning with local, regional, and national development goals as well as the institution’s vision and mission (3.35). Respondents agreed on its effectiveness in applying theories to real problems (3.24), demonstrating skills in strategies for the actual work setting (3.24), logical sequencing of subjects (3.15), responsiveness to country needs and recent developments (3.20), and comprehensive professional preparation (3.24). Key strengths highlighted include bridging theory and practice through hands-on learning, its interdisciplinary approach, and focus on social responsibility and ethical governance. Recommendations for improvement focused on incorporating more law-focused and contemporary content (digital governance, data analytics), increasing practical experiences like internships and fieldwork (particularly in government institutions), and enhancing career preparation for the Civil Service Examination. Conclusion: The BSPA program is a strong and effective offering, successfully providing essential theoretical knowledge, practical skills, and ethical grounding. However, incorporating stakeholder recommendations for enhanced practical application, contemporary content integration, and career readiness support will further strengthen the program and better prepare graduates for the evolving demands of public service.