Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Examining Team Communication and Mutual Support as Drivers of Work Performance among Team Members

Edosomwan Henry Samuel, Oguegbe, Tochukwu Matthew

Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences · pp. 45–54 · Published 20 Mar 2021

10.9734/arjass/2021/v13i430223

Abstract

This study examined team communication and mutual support as drivers of work performance among team members in the organization. The cross-sectional research design was used and with standardized  instruments, data were collected from 133 participants from manufacturing organizations consisting of 63.9% males and 36.1% females whose age ranged from 21-54 years with a mean age of 31.71(SD, 8.7). Work performance was grouped into task performance, contextual performance and counterproductive work behaviour. The hypotheses were tested with the simple regression analysis. Data analysis revealed that team communication positively predicted task performance (β = .56, p < 0.01) and contextual performance (β = .55, p < 0.01) while it negatively predicted counterproductive work behaviour (β = -.21, p < 0.05). Also, mutual support positively predicted task performance (β = .80, p < 0.01) and contextual performance (β = .80, p < 0.01) while it negatively predicted counterproductive work behaviour (β = -.17, p < 0.05). The study recommends that management should encourage employees to work together and also educate them on these key behaviours (communication and mutual support) to help enhance employee performance in the organization.

Team communication mutual support task performance contextual performance counterproductive work behaviour Edosomwan Henry Samuel

References (23)

  1. 1 What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite [DOI]
  2. 2 Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies [DOI]
  3. 3 Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams [DOI]
  4. 4 Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance
  5. 5 Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence [DOI]
  6. 6 The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. [DOI]
  7. 7 A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA [DOI]
  8. 8 Project Team Communication and Cross‐Functional Cooperation in New Program Development [DOI]
  9. 9 Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research [DOI]
  10. 10 Teamwork: emerging principles [DOI]
  11. 11 Performance measurement and managerial teams [DOI]
  12. 12 The Impact of Group Interaction Styles on Problem-Solving Effectiveness [DOI]
  13. 13 Effect of Teamwork on Employee Performance [DOI]
  14. 14 The Organizational Benefits of Teams [DOI]
  15. 15 HRM and employee performance: A case of university teachers of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) in Pakistan [DOI]
  16. 16 Work values, work attitude and job performance of green energy industry employees in Taiwan [DOI]
  17. 17 Relationship between Teamwork and Team Performance: Experiences from an ERPsim Competition.
  18. 18 Team member acquisition of team knowledge, skills, and abilities [DOI]
  19. 19 The effects of internal marketing, job satisfaction and service attitude on job performance among high-tech firm [DOI]
  20. 20 Questioning the Link between Self-Expressed Attitudes and Repurchasing Behavior [DOI]
  21. 21 Performance Concepts and Performance Theory [DOI]
  22. 22 Dimensions of Job Performance [DOI]
  23. 23 http://www.ftms.edu.my/journals/IJABM/Apr2016/76-85.pdf [DOI]

Cited by 10

Showing 5 of 10 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

34

Page views

0

PDF downloads

3

Outbound clicks

10

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.