Histological Bio Monitoring of the Odimodi River Basin Using the Gills of Sarotherodon melanotheron
Allison TA, Wariboko LI, Osunwoke EA
Asian Journal of Biology · pp. 15–28 · Published 24 May 2025
10.9734/ajob/2025/v21i6510Abstract
Aquatic bodies around industrial points are vulnerable to contamination by pollutants such as petrochemicals, solvents, oils, and heavy metals. Chemical and physical parameters are used as biomarkers to monitor aquatic pollution and to evaluate the adverse effects of heavy metals on aquatic organisms. The use of fish gills as bioindicators is an important biomonitoring tool to evaluate environmental pollution. The histological biomarkers adopted to evaluate the health conditions of different organisms indicate potential environmental hazards. Histotoxicology is applied as an effective method to evaluate the influence of contaminants and other stressors in surface waters. Therefore, histological changes in the gill epithelium of Sarotherodon melanotheron were evaluated and adopted as a bioindicator to measure environmental quality in the Odimodi River basin, Delta State, Nigeria. The study was conducted at the Odimodi river basin in study stations: Station 1, Station 2 and Station 3 for water, soil, sediment and fish sampling, respectively. A purposive sample of 40 fish was collected from the referenced and experimental sites. Light microscopy was used to examine the tissues' histology. The data obtained from this study were analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 to get the descriptive and inferential statistics, which include mean, frequency tables, and bar charts. Inferential analysis, such as a binomial t-test for independent samples, and P values, was adjusted to minimise type 1 error. It was observed that the referenced site was in good conservation condition, whereas the experimental sites, Locations 1, 2 and 3, showed contamination. The fish species collected from experimental sites showed lesions such as epithelial lifting, vacuolation, and necrosis in the gills. The analysis of the gills obtained from fish collected at the referenced site ARAC showed HAI equal to <10 to <20, indicating reversible and slight organ damage. The total percentage of fish samples collected was 100% for the referenced Site ARAC and the Experimental sites in the Odimodi River Basin. S. melanotheron recorded Regressive Changes: for vacoulation and structural alterations at ARAC 10%, L1 20%, L2 30% and 40%; and Progressive changes: for necrosis and Hyperplasia at ARAC 0%, L1 10%, L2 20 and L3 40%. This study showed histological changes in the fish gills, which suggest the contamination and pollution of the assessed sites caused by heavy metals. Thus, it is necessary to suggest that histological biomarkers be used as the standard bioindicators to measure the environmental status or impact on the environment.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Morphological Exploration of Lignicolous Macrofungi: Xylaria — shares topic coverage
- The Order Palmariales (Rhodophyta) in the North Pacific Area of Russia: Taxonomic Revision of Halosaccion Kützing and Devaleraea Guiry — shares topic coverage
- Characteristic Variations in Lasiodiplodia theobromae; Pathogen of inflorescence Dieback of Cashew in Growing Ecologies of Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Modifications on the Chemical Composition, X-Ray Diffraction Pattern and Scanning Morphology of Starches from Cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta and Xanthosoma sagittifolium) — shares topic coverage
- Taxonomy of Earthworm Species Collected from East Coast of Guyana — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
15
Page views
0
PDF downloads
7
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.