Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Inter-annual Variations of True Species Richness in a Subtropical Butterfly Assemblage: An Estimation Based on Least-biased Extrapolations of Species Accumulation Curves

Jean Béguinot

Asian Journal of Biology · pp. 1–16 · Published 16 Jun 2017

10.9734/AJOB/2017/33876

Abstract

More or less strong inter-annual variations of species richness are well known in insects in general and in butterfly in particular. Yet, such variations generally rely upon more or less partial samplings and are rarely reliably documented in relevant terms of “true” total species richness (instead of “simply” observed number of species). In addition, equity of sampling completeness between annual inventories proves hard to ensure in practice and had long remained difficult to check properly. Thus, as neither standardized sampling procedures nor rarefaction procedure at a same sampling size may reliably warrant the equity of sampling completeness, asymptotic estimations of total species richness should imperatively be implemented for each annual inventory. This implies that, among the different estimators of the number of missing species available in the literature, the least-biased one should be adequately selected at first, for each annual inventory. As such a procedure of selection is now made available, it becomes possible to tackle relevantly the issue presented above. Applying this procedure to the field data recorded (and already published) by Lee et al. for butterfly assemblages at Mount Gariwang-san (south Korea), surveyed during several years, I show that (i) “true” inter-annual variations of species richness may indeed vary in a large range - from simple to double - along successive years; (ii) annual total species richness represents only a limited part - comprised between less than ≈ 40% and at most ≈ 80% - of the potential species richness of the site (i.e. the true species richness along several years pooled together) .

Diversity sampling completeness nonparametric estimator Gariwang-san Korea Lepidoptera

References (17)

  1. 1 Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation [DOI]
  2. 2 ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: SENSITIVITY TO SAMPLE COVERAGE AND INSENSITIVITY TO SPATIAL PATTERNS [DOI]
  3. 3 Seasonal cycles of species diversity and similarity in a tropical butterfly community [DOI]
  4. 4 When species accumulation curves intersect: implications for ranking diversity using small samples [DOI]
  5. 5 Seasonality of a Diverse Beetle Assemblage Inhabiting Lowland Tropical Rain Forest in Australia [DOI]
  6. 6 Temporal variation in abundance and diversity of butterflies in Bornean rain forests: opposite impacts of logging recorded in different seasons [DOI]
  7. 7 Optimizing performance of nonparametric species richness estimators under constrained sampling [DOI]
  8. 8 Theoretical Derivation of a Bias-reduced Expression for the Extrapolation of the Species Accumulation Curve and the Associated Estimation of Total Species Richness [DOI]
  9. 9 Population fluctuations of light-attracted chrysomelid beetles in relation to supra-annual environmental changes in a Bornean rainforest [DOI]
  10. 10 An Algebraic Derivation of Chao’s Estimator of the Number of Species in a Community Highlights the Condition Allowing Chao to Deliver Centered Estimates [DOI]
  11. 11 Seasonal fluctuation, phenology and turnover of chafer assemblages – insight to the structural plasticity of insect communities in tropical farmlands [DOI]
  12. 12 Butterfly fauna in Mount Gariwang-san, Korea [DOI]
  13. 13 On General Mathematical Constraints Applying to the Kinetics of Species Discovery during Progressive Sampling: Consequences on the Theoretical Expression of the Species Accumulation Curve [DOI]
  14. 14 Least-biased Estimations of True Species Richness of Butterfly Fauna in Sub-urban Sites around Jhansi (India) and the Range of Inter-annual Variation of Species Richness [DOI]
  15. 15 Measuring and Estimating Species Richness, Species Diversity, and Biotic Similarity from Sampling Data [DOI]
  16. 16 Agricultural and Forest Entomology [DOI]
  17. 17 Annual Research & Review in Biology [DOI]

Cited by 2

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

35

Page views

0

PDF downloads

4

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.