Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Prioritized Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making

Zhiming Zhang

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 3217–3236 · Published 11 Jun 2014

10.9734/BJAST/2014/10714

Abstract

This paper presents interval-valued 2-tuple prioritized aggregation operators for handling problems involving multiple attribute group decision making, where a prioritization relationship exists between attributes and decision makers. We first develop two interval-valued 2-tuple prioritized aggregation operators called (i) the interval-valued 2-tuple prioritized weighted average (IV2TPWA) operator and (ii) the interval-valued 2-tuple prioritized weighted geometric (IV2TPWG) operator and examine their desirable properties. The significant feature of these operators is that they not only deal with the linguistic and interval linguistic information but also account for the priority level of the arguments. Next, based on the IV2TPWA and the IV2TPWG operators, we develop an approach to multiple attribute group decision making with interval linguistic information. Finally, a practical example is presented to illustrate our method.

Multiple attribute group decision making interval-valued 2-tuple prioritized weighted average (IV2TPWA) operator interval-valued 2-tuple prioritized weighted geometric (IV2TPWG) operator

References (36)

  1. 1 A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words [DOI]
  2. 2 Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information [DOI]
  3. 3 A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations*1 [DOI]
  4. 4 A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making [DOI]
  5. 5 A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making [DOI]
  6. 6 Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making [DOI]
  7. 7 A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making With Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations [DOI]
  8. 8 Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making [DOI]
  9. 9 Modeling Decisions: Information Fusion and Aggregation Operators [DOI]
  10. 10 On aggregation operations of linguistic labels [DOI]
  11. 11 AN APPROACH FOR COMBINING LINGUISTIC AND NUMERICAL INFORMATION BASED ON THE 2-TUPLE FUZZY LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION MODEL IN DECISION-MAKING [DOI]
  12. 12 The OWA-based consensus operator under linguistic representation models using position indexes [DOI]
  13. 13 Induced uncertain linguistic OWA operators applied to group decision making [DOI]
  14. 14 Prioritized aggregation operators [DOI]
  15. 15 Selecting Uncertainty Calculi and Granularity: An Experiment in Trading-Off Precision and Complexity [DOI]
  16. 16 On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgement matrix in AHP [DOI]
  17. 17 Feature subset selection by Bayesian networks: a comparison with genetic and sequential algorithms [DOI]
  18. 18 EOWA AND EOWG OPERATORS FOR AGGREGATING LINGUISTIC LABELS BASED ON LINGUISTIC PREFERENCE RELATIONS [DOI]
  19. 19 An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations [DOI]
  20. 20 The maximizing deviation method for group multiple attribute decision making under linguistic environment [DOI]
  21. 21 A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information [DOI]
  22. 22 Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy prioritized operators and their application in group decision making [DOI]
  23. 23 Prioritized intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators [DOI]
  24. 24 Prioritized OWA aggregation [DOI]
  25. 25 Approaches based on 2-tuple linguistic power aggregation operators for multiple attribute group decision making under linguistic environment [DOI]
  26. 26 The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information [DOI]
  27. 27 Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making [DOI]
  28. 28 Developing a group decision support system based on fuzzy information axiom [DOI]
  29. 29 Standard and mean deviation methods for linguistic group decision making and their applications [DOI]
  30. 30 Algorithms for fuzzy multi expert multi criteria decision making (ME-MCDM) [DOI]
  31. 31 Consolidating SWOT analysis with nonhomogeneous uncertain preference information [DOI]
  32. 32 On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operators [DOI]
  33. 33 A communication model based on the 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation for a distributed intelligent agent system on Internet [DOI]
  34. 34 Using a web Personal Evaluation Tool – PET for lexicographic multi-criteria service selection [DOI]
  35. 35 Standard deviation method for determining the weights of group multiple attribute decision making under uncertain linguistic environment [DOI]
  36. 36 An Approach to Group Decision Making Problems Based on 2-Tuple Linguistic Aggregation Operators [DOI]

Cited by 8

Hesitant 2-tuple linguistic Bonferroni operators and their utilization in group decision making

Lidong Wang, Yanjun Wang, Witold Pedrycz · Applied Soft Computing · 2019

Showing 4 of 8 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

32

Page views

0

PDF downloads

8

Outbound clicks

8

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.