Intratympanic vs. Oral Steroids for Treatment of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Randomized Controlled Study
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 1–6 · Published 5 Oct 2015
10.9734/BJMMR/2016/21732Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of oral to intratympanicsteroids for treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL). Patients and Methods: A total of 39 ISSHL patients were included in this study. They were consecutively randomized into the “control” group, who received oral prednisone (started with 60 mg/day tapering over 14 days) or the “study” group, who received intratympanic methylprednisolone sodium succinate (four 1- mL doses of 40 mg/mL of methylprednisolone over 2 weeks, with a dose given every 3-4 days by injection through the tympanic membrane into the middle ear). Pure tone audiometry (PTA) was measured for all patients before injection as baseline. Patients were asked to come to the outpatient clinic after two weeks, one month and at the end of the second month to assess hearing, vital signs, otological examination and adverse events. Results: At the last follow up visit, patients in the study group had significantly lower PTA than those in the control group (39.2±6.0 dB and 43.8±6.4 dB, respectively, p=0.027). Improvement in hearing was significantly higher among patients in the study group than those in the control group (32.1±6.9 dB and 27.5±6.5 dB respectively, p=0.041). Significantly higher proportions of patients in the control group had mood change (p=0.035), sleep change (p=0.044) and mouth dryness (p=0.020) than patients in the study group. On the other hand, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the study group had earache (p=0.030). Patients in both groups did not differ significantly as regard blood glucose problems, increased appetite, pain due to injection or weight gain. Patients’ age correlated negatively with improvement in pure tone average (r= -0.267). However, this correlation was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Treatment with intratympanic steroid injection is better than oral steroid treatment of patients with ISSHR. Adverse effects associated with intratympanic injections are less than those associated with systemic steroid therapy.
Cited by 6
Stefan K Plontke, Christoph Meisner, Sumit Agrawal · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022
Young Ho Kim, Doh Young Lee, Dong‐Han Lee · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
Showing 2 of 6 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- The Impact of Nursing Staffing Levels on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review with Implications for Healthcare Policy and Practice — shares topic coverage
- Adverse Events Encountered in Platelet Aphaeresis Procedure and Their Management: A Retrospective Study — shares topic coverage
- Overview of Adverse Events Associated with Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy — shares topic coverage
- Challenges of Percutaneous Closure of PDA in Adolescents and Adults: Single Center Experience — shares topic coverage
- Safety of Cupping Therapy in Studies Conducted in Twenty One Century: A Review of Literature — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
14
Page views
0
PDF downloads
1
Outbound clicks
6
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.