Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Least-biased Estimations of True Species Richness of Butterfly Fauna in Sub-urban Sites around Jhansi (India) and the Range of Inter-annual Variation of Species Richness

Jean Béguinot

Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology · pp. 1–12 · Published 6 Mar 2017

10.9734/AJEE/2017/32040

Abstract

As a rule, most biodiversity inventories at local scales remain more or less incomplete, when dealing with relatively speciose taxonomic groups, such as butterfly in tropical regions. Yet, it remains possible to take maximum advantage of partial inventories and to develop reliable predictions by extrapolating the species accumulation curves beyond the already achieved samplings. Besides, due to the wide diversity of available estimators of total species richness, selecting for the less-biased estimator and the associated expression of the species accumulation curve is desirable. Accordingly, the “least-biased extrapolation procedure” is recommended in this respect. Least-biased extrapolation procedure was applied to nine inventories carried on by Ashok Kumar in (sub-) urban sites in the vicinity of Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh, India), thus providing more accurate evaluations of remnant butterfly species richness in these sites. The range of estimated sampling completeness of inventories was comprised between 65% and 99%, depending on sites and years and the estimated true species richness was comprised between 25 species (along Highway in 2010) and 44 species (Jhansi Fort in 2011). Importantly, the levels of sampling completeness prove to be poorly correlated with sampling size. This highlights the fact that, contrary to still a current opinion, comparisons between levels of species richness may well remain irrelevant, even when made at a same sampling size (for example by using appropriate “rarefaction” procedure). Four, out of the nine studied inventories, were conducted at two same sites for two successive years (2010-2011) and, thus, provide opportunity to evaluate the range of inter-annual variations of true species richness of butterfly fauna in this sub-urban context. Inter-annual variations within the range 24% to 48% were registered, according to sites.  

Lepidoptera diversity species accumulation curve estimator numerical extrapolation minimum bias

References (10)

  1. 1 Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation [DOI]
  2. 2 ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: SENSITIVITY TO SAMPLE COVERAGE AND INSENSITIVITY TO SPATIAL PATTERNS [DOI]
  3. 3 Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies [DOI]
  4. 4 When species accumulation curves intersect: implications for ranking diversity using small samples [DOI]
  5. 5 Species diversity and community structure in neotropical fruit-feeding butterflies [DOI]
  6. 6 Theoretical Derivation of a Bias-reduced Expression for the Extrapolation of the Species Accumulation Curve and the Associated Estimation of Total Species Richness [DOI]
  7. 7 A report on the Butterflies in Jhansi (U.P.) India [DOI]
  8. 8 Extrapolation of the Species Accumulation Curve Associated to “Chao” Estimator of the Number of Unrecorded Species: A Mathematically Consistent Derivation [DOI]
  9. 9 Extrapolation of the Species Accumulation Curve for Incomplete Species Samplings: A New Nonparametric Approach to Estimate the Degree of Sample Completeness and Decide when to Stop Sampling [DOI]
  10. 10 Measuring and Estimating Species Richness, Species Diversity, and Biotic Similarity from Sampling Data [DOI]

Cited by 8

Showing 5 of 8 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

64

Page views

0

PDF downloads

12

Outbound clicks

8

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.