Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Microbial Interactions in the Management of Groundnut Stem Rot

K. Yamunarani, S. Sangeetha, K. Chitra, K. Dhanalakshmi, V. Dhanushkodi

Journal of Advances in Microbiology · pp. 52–60 · Published 15 Jan 2024

10.9734/jamb/2023/v23i12785

Abstract

Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil seed crop in the world belonging to the Leguminosae family. It is one of the essential food and cash crops of our country. In India, a large number of diseases attack groundnut [1]. Among soil borne diseases, stem rot or white mold caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. [2] is an important disease causing significant yield losses in several groundnut growing countries (Mehan et al., 1994). Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. is a destructive soil borne fungal pathogen of oil seed crop in India. Different practices are recommended for management of groundnut stem rot such as deep summer ploughing, destruction of plant debris, crop rotation with jowar and bajra, seed treatment with carbendazim or captan or mancozeb or tebuconazole, soil drenching with hexaconazole, application of ammonium sulphate or calcium ammonium nitrate instead of urea and application of gypsum at flowering stage. Further, no single treatment is full proof and disease continues to cause losses in farmers’ fields. Biological control offers an interesting alternative to fungicides for sustainable management of soil borne diseases. Biocontrol is a non-chemical measure, could be effective as chemical control by various techniques. Among the techniques, the mixture of antagonists was studied to enchance the control efficacy. In most studies, the involvement of only mechanism of biological control is demonstrated. Involvement of more than one mechanism has been reported in only a few systems. Use of several biocontrol agents with several mechanisms of control fits in well with the concepts of integrated disease management, in which several means of disease suppression are applied concurrently. When single or more means of mechanisms are not effective, the others may compensate for the former absence. The present study, involved three major bacterial antagonists viz., Streptomyces violaceusniger, Streptomyces exfoliatus and Pseudomonas fluorescens to find out the effective dose of mixtures. The different doses from 10-1 to 10-5 were studied, the dose 10-1 of Streptomyces violaceusniger have more efficiency of 86.70, than S. exfoliatus. The efficacy of Streptomyces violaceusniger with combination of other antagonists were tested and found that, the mixture of Streptomyces violaceusniger and P.  fluorescens have synergistic activity than any other combinations which have synergistic factor greater than one.

Groundnut stem rot Streptomyces violaceusniger Streptomyces exfoliates Pseudomonas fluorescens

References (12)

  1. 1 Mixtures of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Enhance Biological Control of Multiple Cucumber Pathogens [DOI]
  2. 2 Biological Control of Fusarium Wilt of Cucumber by Chitinolytic Bacteria [DOI]
  3. 3 Combining Biocontrol Agents to Reduce the Variability of Biological Control [DOI]
  4. 4 Effects of Wounding, Inoculum Density, and Biological Control Agents on Postharvest Brown Rot of Stone Fruits [DOI]
  5. 5 The joint action of fungicides in mixtures: comparison of two methods for synergy calculation [DOI]
  6. 6 Effects of Commercial and Indigenous Microorganisms on Fusarium Wilt Development in Chickpea1 [DOI]
  7. 7 The Biology, Ecology, and Control of Sclerotium Rolfsii [DOI]
  8. 8 Bacterial wilt of groundnut.
  9. 9 Biology and the Environment [DOI]
  10. 10 Management of Stem Rot of Groundnut caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. with Actinomycetes [DOI]
  11. 11 Control of Botrytis Rot of Grapes and Vegetables with Trichoderma Spp. [DOI]
  12. 12 Fungal antagonism in aerial agrobiocenoses

Cited by 4

Showing 2 of 4 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

27

Page views

0

PDF downloads

4

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.