Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

On Which Variable(s) Should We Condition to Remove Confounding Bias?

Eyal Shahar, Doron J. Shahar

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 1–9 · Published 11 Aug 2015

10.9734/BJMMR/2015/19751

Abstract

Using causal diagrams and an axiomatization of causality, we examined the well-known claim that conditioning on confounders (“adjustment” for confounders) is sufficient to remove confounding bias. We show that this advice is poorly stated and is incomplete. To remove confounding bias, it is necessary to condition on three types of variables, none of which is a confounder. Conditioning on one of them, however, leads to an interesting form of colliding bias, which in turn, can be removed by conditioning on two other types of variables.

Causal diagrams axioms of causality confounding bias colliding bias conditioning

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

17

Page views

0

PDF downloads

1

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.