Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Perception of Smile Attractiveness by Laypeople–influence of Profession and Treatment Experience

Serene A. Badran, Mariam Mustafa

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 3777–3786 · Published 5 May 2014

10.9734/BJMMR/2014/5545

Abstract

Aims: To assess the influence of profession, treatment experience, age and gender on the perception of smile aesthetics with different buccal corridors and smile arcs, and to identify the threshold where buccal corridor space becomes aesthetically displeasing. Study Design: A questionnaire-based descriptive study on the assessment of attractiveness ratings by laypeople. Place and Duration of Study: Amman/Jordan, University of Jordan Hospital; Faculty of Dentistry, Division of Orthodontics, from 2010-2011. Methodology: A coloured photograph of a female smile was digitally modified to produce six smile images with buccal corridor spaces (BCSs) ranging from 0% to 25% and three smile images with altered smile arcs (consonant, flat and reverse). These images were shown to 104 laypeople who were asked to rate the attractiveness of each smile on a scale of one to ten. Analysis of variance was used to study the effect of age, gender, profession and treatment experience on smile attractiveness rating. A one-way ANOVA post hoc Duncan test was used to establish the threshold where BCS was considered unattractive. Results: The most attractive smile was the broadest and consonant smile (7.42 +/- 1.87). The image with a reverse smile arc was rated as the least attractive (2.65 +/- 1.85). Duncan’s test revealed that the threshold at which BCS was considered significantly unattractive was when it reached 25%. Analysis of variance showed that young adults perceived the broadest smile as significantly more attractive than older adults (P = .03). Profession had a significant influence on smile attractiveness ratings while gender and treatment experience did not. Conclusion: Flattening the smile arc was found to have more of an unattractive bearing than small variations in BCS. Thus, it is advisable to take into consideration the smile arc during any treatment that involves the anterior maxillary area, especially prosthodontic and restorative treatments, orthognathic surgery and orthodontics.

Dentistry orthodontics aesthetics attractiveness buccal corridor space smile arc profession.

Cited by 12

Esthetic evaluation of implants vs canine substitution in patients with congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors: Are there any new insights?

Ute Schneider, Lorenz Moser, Marzia Fornasetti · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · 2016

Evaluation of smile characteristics of skeletal Class III compared to skeletal Class I female adults

Abdallah S. Nouh, H. M. Abdel Majeed, Essam Mohamed Nassef Selim · Journal of Orthodontic Science · 2021

Contrasting perceptions of male and female dental students regarding smile aesthetics based on their gingival display

Yessy Josephine Sijabat, C. Christnawati, Dyah Karunia · Dental Journal · 2018

Dynamic Smile Surgery Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler and Botulinum Toxin-A

Ahmad Nazari · Handbook of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology · 2024

Showing 4 of 12 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

8

Page views

0

PDF downloads

1

Outbound clicks

12

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.