Reconceptualising Industry Responsiveness in TVET: How Sequencing Shapes the Occupational–Regulatory Interface in NQF-Governed Systems
Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · pp. 962–978 · Published 19 Jun 2026
10.9734/ajess/2026/v52i63147Abstract
National Qualifications Frameworks (NQFs) are widely used to classify qualifications through level descriptors, credit systems and learning outcomes. However, TVET systems continue to face persistent difficulties in aligning formal qualifications with the knowledge, practices and competence structures of occupational fields. This conceptual paper examines the policy assumption that NQF-based qualification design inherently improves industry responsiveness. It argues that responsiveness should be understood as an epistemic and governance outcome rather than as a procedural result of consultation, occupational standards or compliance documentation. Using a structured conceptual synthesis, the paper integrates Bernstein’s theory of recontextualisation, institutional logics theory and socio-epistemic accounts of vocational knowledge. The analysis focuses on the meso-level qualification development process in NQF-governed TVET systems, where occupational standards are translated into formal qualification architecture and authorised through regulatory instruments. The paper proposes the Occupational–Regulatory Recontextualisation Framework (ORRF), which conceptualises responsiveness along a continuum between regulatory-dominant sequencing and occupationally grounded sequencing. The framework distinguishes symbolic responsiveness, where occupational alignment is visible procedurally but shaped primarily by regulatory categories, from substantive responsiveness, where occupational authenticity is preserved through the prior structuring of knowledge and practice. Five theoretical propositions are advanced to explain how sequencing, epistemic coherence and knowledge governance shape different responsiveness outcomes. The paper concludes that NQFs do not determine responsiveness by design alone. Instead, responsiveness depends on whether occupational analysis is allowed to structure qualification architecture before regulatory classification occurs. The ORRF provides a conceptual basis for future comparative and case-based research on qualification development in NQF-governed TVET systems and for re-examining how regulatory and occupational authorities interact.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Sustainability and Education: Restoring Dignity of Communities in the Classrooms and Beyond — shares topic coverage
- Global Standards in Vocational Education: Compliance on Ethical Standards in Vocational Sectors Aligned to Globalization — shares topic coverage
- Motivation Level and Skills Preparedness of Non-priority Students under the Culinary Technology Program — shares topic coverage
- Ideal Teacherhood in Vocational Education — shares topic coverage
- Workforce Development for Sustainable Built Environments: A Systematic Review of Skills Gaps, Training Deficiencies, and Strategic Pathways in the Green Construction Industry — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
13
Page views
0
PDF downloads
11
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.