Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Risk Behavior of Small and Marginal Farmers in Cauvery Delta Zone, Tamil Nadu

V. Mohanraj, P. Balasubramaniam, M. Senthilkumar

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 134–142 · Published 4 Mar 2023

10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i31691

Abstract

Farmers’ risk preferences play an important role in agricultural production decisions, risk takers means the farmers who are willing to take risky decisions in farming, risk aversion means an attitude of reluctance to take risky decisions in farming. Climatic change effects all regions across the globe and causes substantial agitations that can be expected to be natural systems that have foreseeable influences on the economic systems of upland regions through both direct and indirect means. Risk preferences reflect the farmers’ personal experiences and beliefs, these preferences explain how the decision-maker assesses and react to risks. This study characterizes risk behaviour among marginal and small farmers in Cauvery Delta Zone and determines how these risk preferences affects the farmers. The study was conducted in Cauvery Delta zone of Thanjavur, Thiruvarur and Nagapattinam districts with a Sample size of 366 farmers which consists of 183 marginal and 183 small farmers was selected randomly based on proportionate random sampling method. The risk behavior was measured by the measure of risk attitude and two lottery methods viz., Eckel-Grossman and Holt-Laury based lottery method. Measure of risk attitude results shows that, 27.60 per cent of farmers were moderate risk taker followed by 24.30 per cent were risk averser and 15.00 per cent of farmers were risk taker. The Eckel and Grossman lottery method result shows CRRA (Constant Relative Risk Aversion) value was 0.38 to 0.67, which shows that marginal farmers were risk aversers and small farmers were moderate risk takers. The CRRA adapted from Holt and Laury [1] range for the maximum was 1.37 and minimum -1.71 for their choices. The majority of marginal farmers were risk aversers, the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers decides the risk preference. The risk-averse farmer this may imply risk-taking behavior that is reduced by risk aversion (resulting in on-farm risk management strategies) and a reduced demand of insurance.

Attitude aversion Cauvery Delta Zone farmers isk preference

References (10)

  1. 1 Gender Differences in Preferences [DOI]
  2. 2 Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects [DOI]
  3. 3 Risk and Time Preferences: Linking Experimental and Household Survey Data from Vietnam [DOI]
  4. 4 Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice [DOI]
  5. 5 Estimating risk attitudes in Denmark: A field experiment [DOI]
  6. 6 Stability of risk preference measures: results from a field experiment on French farmers [DOI]
  7. 7 On the measurement of risk aversion from experimental data [DOI]
  8. 8 Assessing farmers’ risk preferences and their determinants in a marginal upland area of Vietnam: a comparison of multiple elicitation techniques [DOI]
  9. 9 Household's risk attitudes in Indonesian villages [DOI]
  10. 10 Measuring the risk attitude of decision‐makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons? [DOI]

Cited by 2

COVID-19 and Its Effect on Natural Capital of Small and Marginal Farmers

G. Divya, P. Balasubramaniam, M. Nirmala Devi, Patil Santosh Ganapati, V. Mohanraj · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · 2023

Development of Portable Farm Equipment Starter

Arjay A. Bretaňa · American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions · 2026

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

34

Page views

0

PDF downloads

2

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.