Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is a Probability Process

David T. Mage, E. Maria Donner

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 80–93 · Published 8 Dec 2012

10.9734/BJMMR/2013/1990

Abstract

The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is sudden-unexpected death of an infant that remains unexplained after thorough forensic autopsy, death scene investigation and review of the infant's medical history. As the results of a few spins of a roulette wheel cannot establish whether the wheel is honest (uniform value distribution), medical investigations of a few SIDS cases have not been able to uncover the mechanistic cause of death. We propose that this is because statistical analyses of large numbers of independent observations may be required to unmask the apparent probability processes that govern these quite different phenomena. The SIDS male fraction ~0.60 appears as a binomial probability sample characteristic of a condition caused by an X-linked gene. The unique SIDS age distribution (minimum at birth, mode ~63 days, median ~94 days, falling exponentially to zero at ~41.2 months) appears as a probability sample from an underlying Johnson SB (4-parameter lognormal) distribution of ages. The presence of this lognormal distribution is prima facie evidence that a probability process is involved. Matching binomial and SB distribution equations to these physiological phenomena, we propose: The SIDS binomial gender distributions arises from an X-linked recessive allele (q ≈ 2/3) non-protective against acute anoxic encephalopathy; and SIDS Johnson SB age distributions arise from such genetically susceptible infants having three independent risk factors: neurological prematurity (m + 0.31)-1 decreasing with age in months m; risk of respiratory infection increasing with age (41.2 - m)-1; and risk of physiological anemia rising and falling with age (2á´¨σ2)-1/2[exp(-0.5[(y-µ)/σ]2)] , where y = Log[(m + 0.31)/(41.2 - m)] = µ + σ z, µ is median of y, σ is standard deviation of y, with z a standard normal deviate. We show infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Suffocation by Inhalation of Food or Foreign Object have approximately the same male fractions as SIDS, supporting the hypothesis that the same allele of an X-linked gene is responsible for death in all these cases.

SIDS binomial distribution 4-parameter lognormal distribution respiratory distress syndrome X-linkage

References (32)

  1. 1 SYSTEMS OF FREQUENCY CURVES GENERATED BY METHODS OF TRANSLATION [DOI]
  2. 2 SIDS and Other Sleep-Related Infant Deaths: Expansion of Recommendations for a Safe Infant Sleeping Environment [DOI]
  3. 3 Systems of Frequency Curves Generated by Methods of Translation [DOI]
  4. 4 Sudden infant death syndrome [DOI]
  5. 5 The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome [DOI]
  6. 6 Multiple Serotonergic Brainstem Abnormalities in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome [DOI]
  7. 7 Brainstem Serotonergic Deficiency in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome [DOI]
  8. 8 NEONATAL MORTALITY, THE MALE DISADVANTAGE [DOI]
  9. 9 Characteristics of Objects That Cause Choking in Children [DOI]
  10. 10 THE SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME [DOI]
  11. 11 Why females are mosaics, x-chromosome inactivation, and sex differences in disease [DOI]
  12. 12 Environmental Statistics and Data Analysis [DOI]
  13. 13 The fifty percent male excess of infant respiratory mortality [DOI]
  14. 14 A Unifying Theory for SIDS [DOI]
  15. 15 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Problems, Progress and Possibilities
  16. 16 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: Problems, Progress and Possibilities [DOI]
  17. 17 Is sudden infant death syndrome a diagnosis? [DOI]
  18. 18 Reduced haemoglobin levels in infants presenting with apparent life‐threatening events–a retrospective investigation [DOI]
  19. 19 SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME [DOI]
  20. 20 Sudden Infant Death Syndrome [DOI]
  21. 21 Crib Death: The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
  22. 22 Sudden infant death syndrome — a ‘diagnosis’ in search of a disease [DOI]
  23. 23 A genetic basis for the sudden infant death syndrome sex ratio [DOI]
  24. 24 Characteristics of objects that cause choking in children [DOI]
  25. 25 NEONATAL MORTALITY: THE MALE DISADVANTAGE [DOI]
  26. 26 All sudden unexplained infant respiratory deaths may result from the same underlying mechanism [DOI]
  27. 27 Studying sudden infant death syndrome in a developing country [DOI]
  28. 28 Secular trends of sudden infant death syndrome in Norway 1967–1988: application of a method of case identification to Norwegian registry data [DOI]
  29. 29 The fifty percent male excess of infant respiratory mortality [DOI]
  30. 30 Crib Death: The Sudden Infant Death Syndrome [DOI]
  31. 31 Is sudden infant death syndrome a diagnosis? [DOI]
  32. 32 Environmental statistics and data analysis [DOI]

Cited by 1

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

9

Page views

0

PDF downloads

1

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.