Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Use of Specific IgE and Skin Prick Test to Determine Clinical Reaction Severity

Von Ta, Brittany Weldon, Grace Yu, Olivier Humblet, Susan Neale-May, Kari Nadeau

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 410–429 · Published 9 Sep 2011

10.9734/BJMMR/2011/711

Abstract

Aims: To determine whether specific IgE and skin prick test correlate better in predicting reaction severity during a double-blinded placebo controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) for egg, milk, and multiple tree nut allergens. Study design: Prospective study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, August 2009 and ongoing. Methodology: We examined the reaction severity of twenty-four subjects to nine possible food allergens: milk, egg, almond, cashew, hazelnut, peanut, sesame, pecan and walnut. Specific IgE and SPT were performed before each DBPCFC. DBPCFC results were classified into mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) reactions using a modified Bock’s criteria. Results: Twenty four subjects underwent a total of 80 DBPCFC. Eighty percent of all DBPCFCs resulted in a positive reaction. A majority, 71%, were classified as mild. No reactions occurred with a SPT of zero mm while three reactions occurred with a negative specific IgE. All reactions were reversible with medication. Conclusion: These data suggest that SPT and specific IgE levels are not associated with reaction severity (p<0.64 and 0.27, respectively). We also found that combining specific IgE and SPT improved specificity but did not help to achieve clinically useful sensitivity. For instance, an SPT > 5mm had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 50%. Combining SPT > 5mm and IgE > 7 resulted in a reduced sensitivity of 64%. Unexpectedly, a history of anaphylaxis 70% (n=17) was not predictive of anaphylaxis on challenge 4% (n=2).

Double-blinded placebo controlled food challenge food allergy desensitization milk allergy treenut allergy peanut allergy skin prick test specific IgE

References (39)

  1. 1 Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions [DOI]
  2. 2 Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed [DOI]
  3. 3 Fatalities due to anaphylactic reactions to foods [DOI]
  4. 4 Fleiss, J. L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley & Sons, New York‐London‐Sydney‐Toronto 1973. XIII, 233 S. [DOI]
  5. 5 Utility of food-specific IgE concentrations in predicting symptomatic food allergy [DOI]
  6. 6 Update on food allergy [DOI]
  7. 7 Relationship between food-specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive food challenges in children and adolescents [DOI]
  8. 8 US prevalence of self-reported peanut, tree nut, and sesame allergy: 11-year follow-up [DOI]
  9. 9 The natural history of peanut allergy [DOI]
  10. 10 Work Group report: Oral food challenge testing [DOI]
  11. 11 Specificity of allergen skin testing in predicting positive open food challenges to milk, egg and peanut in children [DOI]
  12. 12 Specific oral tolerance induction in children with very severe cow's milk–induced reactions [DOI]
  13. 13 Specific oral tolerance induction in food allergy in children: efficacy and clinical patterns of reaction [DOI]
  14. 14 Allergy or tolerance in children sensitized to peanut: Prevalence and differentiation using component-resolved diagnostics [DOI]
  15. 15 Egg oral immunotherapy in nonanaphylactic children with egg allergy [DOI]
  16. 16 Specific IgE levels in the diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity to cows’ milk protein in the infant [DOI]
  17. 17 Peanut allergy: Emerging concepts and approaches for an apparent epidemic [DOI]
  18. 18 The relationship of allergen-specific IgE levels and oral food challenge outcome [DOI]
  19. 19 Diagnosing peanut allergy with skin prick and specific IgE testing [DOI]
  20. 20 Validity of specific IgE antibodies in children with egg allergy [DOI]
  21. 21 Risk of oral food challenges [DOI]
  22. 22 Dose-response in double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis [DOI]
  23. 23 Future therapies for food allergies [DOI]
  24. 24 Tree Nut Allergens [DOI]
  25. 25 Interpretation of tests for nut allergy in one thousand patients, in relation to allergy or tolerance [DOI]
  26. 26 Quantification of specific IgE to whole peanut extract and peanut components in prediction of peanut allergy [DOI]
  27. 27 Determination of no-observed-adverse-effect levels and eliciting doses in a representative group of peanut-sensitized children [DOI]
  28. 28 The distribution of individual threshold doses eliciting allergic reactions in a population with peanut allergy [DOI]
  29. 29 Improved screening for peanut allergy by the combined use of skin prick tests and specific IgE assays [DOI]
  30. 30 Oral Specific Desensitization in Food-Allergic Children [DOI]
  31. 31 Does severity of low‐dose, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled food challenges reflect severity of allergic reactions to peanut in the community? [DOI]
  32. 32 Peanut Allergy [DOI]
  33. 33 Threshold levels in food challenge and specific IgE in patients with egg allergy: Is there a relationship? [DOI]
  34. 34 Reducing the need for food allergen challenges in young children: a comparison of in vitro with in vivo tests [DOI]
  35. 35 Combining skin prick, immediate skin application and specific‐IgE testing in the diagnosis of peanut allergy in children [DOI]
  36. 36 Peanut challenge: a retrospective study of 140 patients [DOI]
  37. 37 Single–tree nut immunotherapy attenuates allergic reactions in mice with hypersensitivity to multiple tree nuts [DOI]
  38. 38 The predictive value of a positive prick skin test to peanut in atopic, peanut-naïve children [DOI]
  39. 39 Sensibilisation aux allergènes d'arachide chez les nourrissons de moins de quatre mois [DOI]

Cited by 62

Dysmenorrhea in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Subset of Patients Report Worsening and Partial Antihistamine Benefit: UCARE HURDLE-I Study.

Türk M, Yücel MB, Yılmaz İ · Int J Dermatol · 2026

From bite to brain: Neuro-immune interactions in food allergy.

Houghton V, Eiwegger T, Florsheim EB · Allergy · 2024

Whence and wherefore IgE?

Rahman RS, Wesemann DR. · Immunol Rev · 2024

Unusual anaphylaxis induced by food allergen inhalation or skin contact.

Jiang NN, Xiang L, Huang HJ · Asia Pac Allergy · 2024

Acute systemic myeloid inflammatory and stress response in severe food allergic reactions.

Sharma A, Rijavec M, Tomar S · Clin Exp Allergy · 2023

Storage Proteins Are Driving Pediatric Hazelnut Allergy in a Lipid Transfer Protein-Rich Area.

Valbuena T, Reche M, Marco G · Foods · 2021

Estimating the Risk of Severe Peanut Allergy Using Clinical Background and IgE Sensitization Profiles.

Datema MR, Lyons SA, Fernández-Rivas M · Front Allergy · 2021

Lipid Transfer Protein Sensitization: Risk of Anaphylaxis and Molecular Sensitization Profile in Pru p 3-Sensitized Patients.

Ruano-Zaragoza M, Somoza ML, Jiménez-Rodriguez TW · Int Arch Allergy Immunol · 2021

Biomarkers of diagnosis and resolution of food allergy.

Foong RX, Santos AF. · Pediatr Allergy Immunol · 2021

Change in exhaled nitric oxide during peanut challenge is related to severity of reaction.

Percival E, Bhatia R, Preece K · Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol · 2020

Showing 46 of 62 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Related research

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

94

Page views

0

PDF downloads

6

Outbound clicks

62

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.