Adopter Categorization and Level of Adoption among Protected Cut Flower Growers
S. Mercy Sheeba, G. Anand, C. Karthikeyan, M. Nirmala Devi, R. Gangai Selvi
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 2730–2739 · Published 3 Aug 2023
10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i92505Abstract
In India, Tamil Nadu occupies the first position in terms of area under flower cultivation then followed by Karnataka and West Bengal. Out of the 33 districts in Tamil Nadu, Krishnagiri district ranks first in cut flower production due to its suitability to climatic conditions. The cut flowers are by and large cultivated under protected conditions (poly greenhouse structure) to meet the quality standards as expected in the global trade arena. The present study was conducted to identify the adopter categories and their level of adoption with respect to protected cut flower cultivation technologies. An ex-post facto research design was used for the study. The first two intensive blocks (Thally & Hosur) cultivating cut flowers under protected methods were purposefully selected for the present study. From both blocks, six villages were selected, and the data were collected from 120 respondents among these twelve selected villages using a well-structured interview schedule. The collected data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, cumulative frequency, and principal component analysis (PCA). The results of the adopter categorization showed that 40.83 percent of respondents belonged to the early majority and only 5.00 percent were innovators. The results regarding the overall adoption of protected cultivation by each adopter category reported that 54.17 percent of respondents had medium-level adoption, in that 44.61 percent and 30.77 percent were early majority and late majority, respectively. The majority of respondents have a medium-level adoption of protected cultivation, leaving potential for growth among early majority and late majority adopters. Targeted strategies and incentives should address their specific needs, and encouraging more innovators to adopt can drive widespread adoption.
References (7)
- 1 Floriculture sector in India: current status and export potential [DOI]
- 2 Foundations of Management Information Systems
- 3 Impact of Farmer Producer Organisations on organic chilli (Capsicum frutescens) production in Telangana [DOI]
- 4 Protected cultivation in Maharashtra: determinants of adoption, constraints, and impact [DOI]
- 5 A Study on Adoption Rate of Hybrid Rice in Jammu District, India [DOI]
- 6 STUDY ON DIFFUSION PATHWAY AND ADOPTION DIMENSIONS OF NEWLY RELEASED RICE VARIETIES IN CHHATTISGARH PLAINS
- 7 KNOWLEDGE AND ADOPTION OF PROTECTED CULTIVATION TECHNOLOGY BY CAPSICUM GROWERS
Cited by 2
Bristy Banik, Hasneen Jahan, Md. Rubel Ahmed · Sustainable Futures · 2025
Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- A Study on the Knowledge Level and Extent of Adoption of Plant Protection Measures against Blast Disease of Rice by the Farmers of Indian Sundarbans — shares topic coverage
- Adoption Level of Scientific Goat Farming Practices among Goat Farmers — shares topic coverage
- Adoption Level of Masumbi (Citrus sinensis) Growers and Its Relationship with Their Personality Traits in Haryana, India — shares topic coverage
- Farmers' Adoption Level of the Pratapdhan Breed in Backyard Poultry Farming in Udaipur District, Rajasthan, India — shares topic coverage
- Impact of Cutting and Tailoring Training on Skill Development and Adoption among SC Farm Women — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
45
Page views
0
PDF downloads
5
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.