Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Strategies for Preventing Environmental Mastitis in Dairy Farming: A Review

Sahu Chinmayee, Misra Arun Kumar, Mohanty Tushar Kumar, Chopra Deepak

Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research · pp. 7–15 · Published 27 Mar 2024

10.9734/ajaar/2024/v24i4498

Abstract

The dairy industry must adhere to stringent international standards due to the growing demand for healthy, high-quality, and affordable dairy products worldwide. To ensure the quality of raw milk, key markers such as Bulk Milk Somatic Cell Count (BMSCC) and Total Bacterial Count (BMTBC) have become standard benchmarks. However, mastitis, the most common disease affecting dairy cows, poses a significant risk to both animal welfare and the long-term sustainability of the dairy sector. Mastitis leads to reduced milk production, increased treatment costs, milk withholding during treatment, higher labor requirements, and premature culling of affected cows. In India alone, mastitis costs the dairy industry 2.37 billion rupees annually, with subclinical mastitis accounting for approximately 70% of this loss. While contagious infections have been effectively controlled, environmental mastitis pathogens such as Streptococcus uberis, Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp now pose the primary concern for mastitis control. The management of cow bedding materials is crucial as they serve as a significant source of exposure to these environmental infections. This review study provides a detailed discussion of environmental mastitis pathogen control, emphasizing the critical role of bedding materials in reducing the risk of exposure to these pathogens.

Environmental mastitis bedding material udder health dairy cows

References (53)

  1. 1 Production effects related to mastitis and mastitis economics in dairy cattle herds [DOI]
  2. 2 A 100-Year Review: Mastitis detection, management, and prevention [DOI]
  3. 3 Switchgrass as a biofuels feedstock in the USA [DOI]
  4. 4 Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing [DOI]
  5. 5 Effects of Three Types of Free-Stall Surfaces on Preferences and Stall Usage by Dairy Cows [DOI]
  6. 6 Influence of Dry Period Bacterial Intramammary Infection on Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows [DOI]
  7. 7 Effects of Bedding Quality on Lying Behavior of Dairy Cows [DOI]
  8. 8 Bacterial Populations on Teat Ends of Dairy Cows Housed in Free Stalls and Bedded with Either Sand or Sawdust [DOI]
  9. 9 The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions [DOI]
  10. 10 Monitoring Indices of Cow Comfort in Free-Stall-Housed Dairy Herds [DOI]
  11. 11 Relationship Between Antimicrobial Drug Usage and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Positive Mastitis Pathogens [DOI]
  12. 12 Managing Environmental Mastitis [DOI]
  13. 13 Cow comfort in tie-stalls: Increased depth of shavings or straw bedding increases lying time [DOI]
  14. 14 Relationships among bedding materials, bedding bacteria counts, udder hygiene, milk quality, and udder health in US dairy herds [DOI]
  15. 15 Factors associated with mastitis epidemiologic indexes, animal hygiene, and bulk milk bacterial concentrations in dairy herds housed on compost bedding [DOI]
  16. 16 Preferences of dairy cows kept in unheated buildings for different kind of cubicle flooring [DOI]
  17. 17 A study on cow comfort and risk for lameness and mastitis in relation to different types of bedding materials [DOI]
  18. 18 Associations between cow hygiene, hock injuries, and free stall usage on US dairy farms [DOI]
  19. 19 Bacteria Counts in Sawdust Bedding [DOI]
  20. 20 Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count [DOI]
  21. 21 Understanding the Basics of Mastitis
  22. 22 Ability of Organic and Inorganic Bedding Materials to Promote Growth of Environmental Bacteria [DOI]
  23. 23 Somatic cell count status across the dry period as a risk factor for the development of clinical mastitis in the subsequent lactation [DOI]
  24. 24 Bacterial Counts Associated with Sawdust and Recycled Manure Bedding Treated with Commercial Conditioners [DOI]
  25. 25 Management and characteristics of recycled manure solids used for bedding in Midwest freestall dairy herds [DOI]
  26. 26 Effects of sawdust bedding dry matter on lying behavior of dairy cows: A dose-dependent response [DOI]
  27. 27 Consumer Trust in the U.S. Food System: An Examination of the Recreancy Theorem [DOI]
  28. 28 Effect of pH on an In Vitro Model of Gastric Microbiota in Enteral Nutrition Patients [DOI]
  29. 29 Associations of selected bedding types with incidence rates of subclinical and clinical mastitis in primiparous Holstein dairy cows [DOI]
  30. 30 The impact of dairy cows' bedding material and its microbial content on the quality and safety of milk – A cross sectional study of UK farms [DOI]
  31. 31 Association of bedding types with management practices and indicators of milk quality on larger Wisconsin dairy farms [DOI]
  32. 32 Mastitis Control in Dairy Production
  33. 33 Properties of conventional and alternative bedding materials for dairy cattle [DOI]
  34. 34 Production of recycled manure solids for bedding in Canadian dairy farms: I. Solid–liquid separation [DOI]
  35. 35 Effects of alternative deep bedding options on dairy cow preference, lying behavior, cleanliness, and teat end contamination [DOI]
  36. 36 Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure with mulched switchgrass for improvement of the methane yield [DOI]
  37. 37 An investigation of seasonal variations in the microbiota of milk, feces, bedding, and airborne dust [DOI]
  38. 38 Feasibility of Miscanthus as alternative bedding for dairy cows [DOI]
  39. 39 Growth of Environmental Mastitis Pathogens in Various Bedding Materials [DOI]
  40. 40 An evaluation of mattresses and mats in two dairy units [DOI]
  41. 41 Comparison of Bacteria Populations in Clean and Recycled Sand used for Bedding in Dairy Facilities [DOI]
  42. 42 Evaluation of Free-Stall Mattress Bedding Treatments to Reduce Mastitis Bacterial Growth [DOI]
  43. 43 Associations of soft flooring materials in free stalls with milk yield, clinical mastitis, teat lesions, and removal of dairy cows [DOI]
  44. 44 Economic Losses due to Subclinical Mastitis in Dairy Animals: A Study in Bidar District of Karnataka [DOI]
  45. 45 Use of Impact Testing to Predict Softness, Cow Preference, and Hardening Over Time of Stall Bases [DOI]
  46. 46 Evaluation of a clay-based acidic bedding conditioner for dairy cattle bedding [DOI]
  47. 47 Evaluation of the Physical Properties of Bedding Materials for Dairy Cattle Using Fuzzy Clustering Analysis [DOI]
  48. 48 Recycled manure solids as bedding for dairy cattle: a scoping study.
  49. 49 Evaluation of propane flaming for reducing bacterial counts in sand bedding [DOI]
  50. 50 THERMAL DISINFECTION OF POULTRY GROW-OUT FACILITIES IN CENTRAL-NORTHERN ITALY
  51. 51 The microbiome of common bedding materials before and after use on commercial dairy farms [DOI]
  52. 52 Comparison of microbiota of recycled manure solids and straw bedding used in dairy farms in eastern Canada [DOI]
  53. 53 Role of Trisodium Citrate and Nanominerals in Mastitis Management in Dairy Animals: A Review [DOI]

Cited by 8

Behavioral factors linking sustainability and animal welfare in dairy farming

Mohammad Mohammadzadeh, Dariush Hayati, Naser Valizadeh · Scientific Reports · 2025

Showing 1 of 8 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

36

Page views

0

PDF downloads

4

Outbound clicks

8

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.