The Effect of Objective Knowledge on Consumer Acceptance towards GM Foods in Ghana
Lilian Owusu-Gyan, Amoateng Priscilla Achiaa, Kinzonzi Ngongo Nevie Chrislie
Journal of Economics, Management and Trade · pp. 12–23 · Published 21 Mar 2023
10.9734/jemt/2023/v29i51091Abstract
Since the middle of the 1990s, when GM food was first developed, genetically modified (GM) foods have been the subject of much discussion. This biotechnology invention enables farmers in various nations to boost output. In this study, we aim to explore the effect of consumer knowledge on attitudes towards GM foods in Ghana. We investigate the association between consumers' attitudes toward GM foods and their level of trust and objective knowledge. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 509 people in Ghana to look into this connection. Participants were required to respond to a questionnaire that evaluated their general attitude toward GM foods, perceived risk, perceived benefit, trust and objective knowledge of GM foods, with an age range from (20-50 years and higher), and different levels of educational level. Results indicated that PHD consumers had a higher level of objective knowledge, (93%) to be precise, followed by High School Students with a percentage of (87%). We employed multiple regression analysis to investigate the link between the independent and dependent variables. Data were analyzed through IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 22.0 and AMOS 18. The structural equation model (SEM) was used in this study to examine the impact of objective knowledge and trust on consumers' attitudes toward genetically modified (GM) foods in Ghana. Results for the model indicated that Knowledge had a stronger correlation with attitude, with a standard regression weight of (.252), but trust had a weaker correlation on attitude amongst Ghanaian consumers. It had a standard regression weight of (-.612). The P-Value for the model indicated that the estimated path coefficients are highly statistically significant, with an extremely low probability of the observed results occurring by chance. Suggesting that the model fits the data well and the estimated coefficients are reliable and robust. The effect of the two constructs on the willingness to accept GM foods was statistically significant. Overall, the level of education somewhat impacts the level of objective knowledge. Knowledge positively impacted consumers’ willingness to accept GM food, whiles trust negatively impacted consumer willingness to accept GM foods.
Cited by 8
Adeola Omotosha Dolapo, Helen Onyeaka, Chiemerie Theresa Ekwueme · Food Science & Nutrition · 2025
Soné Corné van Zuydam, Elizabeth Kempen · Agriculture & Food Security · 2025
John Kojo Ahiakpa, Benj Karikari, Selorm Akaba · 2025
Soné Corné Van Zuydam, Elizabeth Louise Kempen · Open Agriculture · 2025
Showing 4 of 8 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Knowledge and Attitude towards Ebola Virus Disease among Commercial Tricycle (Keke) Riders in Abakaliki, South-East Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Nurses Attitude and Barriers toward Utilization of Standardized Nursing Language in Sokoto State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Implementation of WHO, 2006 Child Growth Standards: Health Workers Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices in Kasarani, Kenya — shares topic coverage
- A Statistical Approach towards Cervical Cancer Awareness among Women in Ghana — shares topic coverage
- Prevalence of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods and Factors Affecting their Use among Married Women in Akasta Town, North-East Ethiopia — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
5
Page views
0
PDF downloads
5
Outbound clicks
8
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.